Legal Pluralism as Opposed to Ronald Dworkin's 'One Right Answer' A Legal Appraisal

Abstract

Legal Pluralism and One Right Answer are two prominent theories within jurisprudence. The former proposition is a theoretical construct primarily posited by John Griffiths, while the latter is an outstanding thesis advanced by Ronald Dworkin. Nevertheless, a comparative analysis of these two theories has been limited to determine the optimal approach. This article compares two ideas in their efficacy in resolving challenging cases. The premise posits that Legal Pluralism is a suitable counterpoint to Ronald Dworkin's One Right Answer and is a superior method for addressing intricate matters. The article additionally illustrates the domains in which the two theories have undergone legal evaluation.